Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70805

in Baton Rouge, LouisianaPopulation 23,288

19.03/ 100

Ranked #31,932 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)

Ranked #506 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 0.4%)

Ranked #83 of 83 Baton Rouge, LA ZIPs (bottom 1.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

11.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

52.9%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

32.6%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

27.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.9%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

40.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

38.3%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 70805, one of several in Baton Rouge, Louisiana ranks in the bottom 0.5% nationally (31,932nd) and the bottom 0.4% of Louisiana (506th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled self-care disability resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and vision disability registers in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled independent living disability rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 0.04% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the top 0.03% nationally, cognitive disability lands in the top 0.4% nationally, and diabetes sits in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 0.5% nationally, stroke settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the top 0.07% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Close by, ZIP 70767, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baton Rouge, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 69.4 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $25,397 predicts 74.7 years — 5.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,612 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 69.4 ± 1.5 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.4 years — 7.1 years below them.

    Ranked #3,636 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.6 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 69.4 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #409 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%30.5–36.2
High blood pressure among adults55.2%51.9–58.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
Current asthma among adults13.1%11.6–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.2%11.9–14.6
Depression among adults25.8%22.7–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.9%22.6–27.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%34.4–41.1
Obesity among adults49.9%44.7–55.0
Stroke among adults7.5%6.9–8.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years33.6%29.1–38.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.2%12.2–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.7–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.8%81.3–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.4–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%57.4–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.8%36.6–43.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%74.6–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%10.1–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.5%24.5–30.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.6%38.3–46.8
Short sleep duration among adults52.9%48.2–57.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults40.8%37.4–44.1
Frequent mental distress among adults24.3%21.9–26.6
Frequent physical distress among adults20.6%18.5–22.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults27.3%24.7–29.8
Any disability among adults50.5%46.5–54.4
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Independent living disability among adults18.7%16.9–20.5
Mobility disability among adults28.7%26.1–31.3
Self-care disability among adults11.5%10.5–12.5
Vision disability among adults14.9%13.7–16.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults38.5%34.7–42.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults52.2%48.4–55.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults54.6%51.0–58.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults38.3%34.8–41.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults27.0%24.5–29.6
Loneliness among adults42.3%38.1–46.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults32.6%29.6–35.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate42.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6416.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)27.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)13.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle21.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription81.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)49.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate40.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households23.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+12.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age35.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$25,397$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$108,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$834$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth69.4 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 69.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured