Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70801

in Baton Rouge, LouisianaPopulation 192

45.04/ 100

Ranked #22,355 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #113 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #30 of 83 Baton Rouge, LA ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

3.9%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

260 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.5 days/year

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.5 mi

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 70801, one of several in Baton Rouge, Louisiana ranks in the bottom 30% nationally (22,355th) and the top 22% of Louisiana (113th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: homeownership resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 4.1% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover lies at the national minimum, distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled tooth loss sits in the top 7.2% nationally. More encouragingly, walkability is in the top 1.2% nationally, poverty settles at the national minimum, and floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Close by, ZIP 70808, about 1.1 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baton Rouge, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%23.3–29.0
High blood pressure among adults38.1%34.4–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.0–9.6
Depression among adults28.1%24.6–31.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.0–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.6–39.6
Obesity among adults35.0%30.0–40.1
Stroke among adults3.4%2.9–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.1%21.2–29.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.1–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%70.9–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.5–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%81.6–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.8%58.2–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.8%54.3–61.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%68.0–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.2–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%12.7–21.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%20.5–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%35.7–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%18.0–26.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%16.4–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%11.6–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%15.0–21.9
Any disability among adults34.6%29.2–40.0
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.0–8.1
Independent living disability among adults9.5%7.6–11.4
Mobility disability among adults14.4%11.6–17.0
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.6–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.1–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%22.8–30.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.1%16.5–26.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.7%14.4–23.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%12.7–19.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.1–13.7
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.2–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.0–14.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)73.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate3.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population18.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+3.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$115,708$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,680$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.2 yr ± 1.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 71.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured