Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

69343

in Gordon, NebraskaPopulation 2,544

51.91/ 100

Ranked #13,578 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #402 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.95 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

84.2 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.9%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.6%

in the bottom 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gordon, Nebraska (ZIP 69343), by its composite score, sits in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,578th) and the bottom 29% of Nebraska (402nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: mental-health providers settles in the top 1.2% nationally, and childcare sits in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and elder services rests in the top 3.0% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 4.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Pharmacy lands in the top 7.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled energy burden stands in the top 2.5% nationally, walkability registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and modeled nitrate settles in the top 5.7% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 69218, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.3–32.4
High blood pressure among adults39.3%35.6–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.3–9.6
Depression among adults17.0%14.5–19.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%31.2–38.4
Obesity among adults36.8%31.1–42.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.4–15.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.9–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.8–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.7–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.1–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%58.1–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.7%57.0–64.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%61.2–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.5–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.3–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%27.0–35.8
Short sleep duration among adults32.0%26.4–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.1–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%11.1–14.3
Any disability among adults32.2%28.2–36.2
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.8–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%18.1–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.6–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.3–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.5
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.0–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate69.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households57.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+25.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$59,741$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$116,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$680$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured