ZIP code
69214
in Johnstown, NebraskaPopulation 177
50.62/ 100
Ranked #15,396 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)
Ranked #455 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 20%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Energy-cost burden
6.6%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.5 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
39.3 mi
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
108.1 mi
in the top 3.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.2%
in the bottom 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
8.8%
in the top 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
16.5 per million
in the bottom 6.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Nitrate in drinking water
0.55%
in the top 7.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST67thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.5%
in the top 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Johnstown, Nebraska (ZIP 69214) ranks in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,396th) and the bottom 20% of Nebraska (455th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: home broadband subscription sits at the national maximum, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled energy burden rests in the top 1.5% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center lies in the top 2.3% nationally. Crowded housing lands in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled nitrate sits in the top 7.2% nationally.
To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 68778, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 96%
8%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 49%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Disability
healthier than 46%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 36%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 11%
16%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 68%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 88%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 42%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 45%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 13%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 4%
16%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
68778
Nebraskashares a border
Score 51.37
Closest healthier
69220
Nebraskashares a border
Score 53.14
Similar health profile
69030
Nebraska99% similar profile
Score 52.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.0% | 28.3–35.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.1% | 36.8–45.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.3% | 10.2–12.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.3% | 8.1–10.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.0% | 7.8–10.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.0% | 7.3–11.0 |
| Depression among adults | 16.8% | 14.1–19.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.0% | 11.9–16.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.4% | 34.1–43.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.4% | 32.8–48.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 3.8–5.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 9.7% | 7.9–11.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.1% | 6.8–12.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.9% | 80.2–85.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.9% | 74.3–81.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.8% | 83.6–87.8 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.8% | 61.8–71.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 64.4% | 61.2–67.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.9% | 62.7–78.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.6% | 14.7–20.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.0% | 11.8–18.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.2% | 23.8–34.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 30.3% | 24.7–36.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.7% | 15.4–22.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.3% | 11.4–15.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.1% | 11.9–16.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.1% | 10.2–14.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.7% | 26.8–36.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.4% | 9.1–11.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.1% | 6.8–9.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.4% | 13.6–19.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.1% | 3.4–5.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.4–6.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.8% | 16.4–23.3 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.9% | 9.2–14.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 6.8–11.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 6.4–9.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.2% | 5.1–7.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.2% | 22.6–31.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.8% | 4.8–7.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NE median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 2.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 3.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 19.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 23.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 18.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578 |
| Homeownership rate | 60.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 8.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579 |
| Single-parent households | 70.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577 |
| Population 65+ | 20.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579 |
| Median age | 54.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577 |
| Median household income | $64,293 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556 |
| Median home value | $181,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $850 ($610–$1,250) n=442 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NE median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.6 yr ± 1.41 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured