Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

69129

in Chappell, NebraskaPopulation 1,292

51.59/ 100

Ranked #14,004 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #416 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

41.5 mi

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

61.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.76%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19 per million

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Chappell, Nebraska (ZIP 69129) comes out in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,004th) and the bottom 27% of Nebraska (416th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: elder services registers in the top 1.2% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and pharmacy lands in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the bottom 4.5% nationally, civic resides in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center lies in the top 1.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes sits in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled nitrate settles in the top 6.8% nationally, and energy burden registers in the top 6.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 69122, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%28.8–36.3
High blood pressure among adults42.0%37.4–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.5–10.4
Depression among adults17.2%14.4–20.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.3–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%34.9–44.0
Obesity among adults40.5%32.4–48.9
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.2–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.6–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.1%80.5–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.0–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%58.3–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.2%60.7–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%64.9–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.5–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%12.8–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%24.5–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%24.3–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%15.9–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.6
Any disability among adults32.0%27.6–36.7
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.0–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.2–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.4–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.9–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–7.0
Loneliness among adults27.4%22.9–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6417.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate82.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+26.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$67,105$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$107,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$938$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.85 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured