Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68450

in Tecumseh, NebraskaPopulation 3,124

48.26/ 100

Ranked #18,601 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #523 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 7.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

22.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.4 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.2%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

11.2%

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

57.2%

in the bottom 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33.1%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$46,132

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Tecumseh, Nebraska (ZIP 68450), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 42% nationally (18,601st) and the bottom 7.6% of Nebraska (523rd).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled radon rests in the top 2.4% nationally, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 1.7% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 7.8% nationally, distance to a nursing home registers in the top 10.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands in the top 11.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands in the top 12.3% nationally, and modeled energy burden is in the top 9.7% nationally. More positively, pharmacy resides in the top 3.5% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 68329, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 22.7; chronic-disease standing 73.9 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,505 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%20.3–25.9
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.1–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Current asthma among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Depression among adults15.4%12.9–18.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%29.2–37.0
Obesity among adults39.6%32.4–47.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%14.0–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%12.2–17.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.2–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.5%67.4–75.3
Cholesterol screening among adults80.2%77.7–82.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.2%51.5–62.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.8%53.9–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%65.3–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.2%18.7–25.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.6–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.1%27.4–37.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%27.7–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.6%16.9–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.5–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.3–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%12.0–15.4
Any disability among adults30.4%26.3–34.7
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.6–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%21.4–28.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.3–20.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.7–14.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.0–15.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Loneliness among adults30.5%25.6–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6410.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)19.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle11.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription85.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate57.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households60.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$46,132$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$158,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$805$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured