Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68367

in Gresham, NebraskaPopulation 342

54.49/ 100

Ranked #10,089 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #264 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.5 pCi/L

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

4.3%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.7 mi

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gresham, Nebraska (ZIP 68367), in overall standing, comes out in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,089th) and the top 47% of Nebraska (264th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 11.9% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon registers in the top 0.8% nationally, and nitrate is in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled binge drinking registers in the top 6.6% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 12.7% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies in the bottom 13.5% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 68439, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%23.9–28.5
High blood pressure among adults33.6%30.7–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.4–9.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.7
Depression among adults18.4%16.3–20.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%31.6–37.4
Obesity among adults40.2%35.5–44.9
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.4–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.1–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.4–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.7%71.9–77.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.3–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.6%57.1–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.1%63.0–69.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%66.5–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%17.6–22.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.4–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%22.1–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%26.6–36.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%13.6–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.1–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
Any disability among adults27.6%24.5–30.7
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.8–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.2–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.8–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–8.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.9–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6433.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate84.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households46.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age53.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$67,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$86,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$725$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured