Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67951

in Hugoton, KansasPopulation 4,563

43.08/ 100

Ranked #24,309 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #616 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 9.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

19.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.9%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

8.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

56.2 days/year

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

17.7%

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Hugoton, Kansas (ZIP 67951) lands in the bottom 24% nationally (24,309th) and the bottom 9.7% of Kansas (616th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: lead in tap water is at the national minimum. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Grocery settles in the top 6.5% nationally, and elder services lies in the top 6.6% nationally. Against that, modeled uninsured resides in the top 4.6% nationally, mammography lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and nitrate registers in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled disaster risk sits in the top 3.5% nationally, tree cover rests at the national minimum, and extreme heat is in the top 7.9% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 67855, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.3%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.6%24.5–30.8
High blood pressure among adults37.0%32.9–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Depression among adults20.2%17.0–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.3–42.0
Obesity among adults41.6%33.2–50.0
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.1–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.9%16.5–23.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.4–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.5%71.6–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.1%78.6–83.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%53.0–65.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.9%50.7–59.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.9%54.8–75.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.0–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%15.6–21.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.9%31.4–42.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%30.0–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.1%23.4–30.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.4–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.2–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%16.3–21.2
Any disability among adults38.5%33.5–43.5
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.6
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.2–12.1
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.1–21.4
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.7–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%18.8–26.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.8–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.0–20.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.3–12.4
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.6–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.2–13.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6426.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)26.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate73.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population14.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households47.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$63,527$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$131,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$936$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured