Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67855

in Johnson, KansasPopulation 1,831

47.58/ 100

Ranked #19,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #455 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

6.1%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.4%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

4.5%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

76.4 mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.7%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.00%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Johnson, Kansas (ZIP 67855), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 39% nationally (19,469th) and the bottom 33% of Kansas (455th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled uninsured registers in the top 5.0% nationally, tree cover lands at the national minimum, and disaster risk resides in the top 5.4% nationally. Better still, mental-health providers lies in the top 0.8% nationally, pharmacy settles in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled pfas stands in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 5.6% nationally, and poverty registers in the bottom 6.2% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, mental-health providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 67878, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.2–28.1
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.2–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.3–8.7
Depression among adults19.5%16.4–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.7–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%31.9–40.2
Obesity among adults39.3%31.1–47.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.6%17.0–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.4%15.9–23.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.5–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.3%70.2–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.4%78.9–83.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.5%51.9–62.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.2%51.3–59.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%61.5–78.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.5–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.6–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%29.2–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%28.7–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%21.2–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%12.9–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.9
Any disability among adults36.3%31.5–41.1
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.4–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%20.4–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%17.5–24.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.4–14.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.3–19.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.7
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.7–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.5–12.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6433.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)22.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)4.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate74.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population36.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households49.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+12.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$72,184$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$67,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$712$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.5 yr ± 2.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.69 years of 87.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured