Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67492

in Woodbine, KansasPopulation 200

44.31/ 100

Ranked #23,103 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #596 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 12.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.3%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.8%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.7%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Woodbine, Kansas (ZIP 67492) ranks in the bottom 28% nationally (23,103rd) and the bottom 12.7% of Kansas (596th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fiber broadband is at the national maximum, and modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Poverty registers in the bottom 14.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon rests in the top 10.1% nationally, extreme heat stands in the top 10.8% nationally, and obesity lies in the top 8.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 13.9% nationally, modeled energy burden sits in the top 11.3% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 15% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 66441, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.2–36.5
High blood pressure among adults41.2%36.8–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Depression among adults21.2%18.0–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.6–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.1–44.8
Obesity among adults43.3%35.7–50.8
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.8%12.3–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%7.9–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.7–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.4–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.7–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.6%56.6–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.9%56.4–63.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.5%63.7–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.5–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%15.4–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%27.1–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%29.1–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%19.9–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.7–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
Any disability among adults37.3%32.4–42.2
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults18.7%16.0–21.5
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.6–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.2–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.5–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.0–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.5–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)0.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription82.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate75.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households44.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age49.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$73,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$128,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$791$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured