ZIP code
67360
in Peru, KansasPopulation 259
40.36/ 100
Ranked #26,516 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #654 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
12.3%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
10.9%
in the top 4.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
14.5 mi
in the top 8.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
1.1%
in the top 8.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Mammography
68.4%
in the bottom 8.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST5thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
23.1%
in the top 10.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.3%
in the top 10.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
21.4%
in the top 11.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS88thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
8.1%
in the top 15.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS85thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
44.5%
in the top 13.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS86thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Peru, Kansas (ZIP 67360) sits in the bottom 17% nationally (26,516th) and the bottom 4.2% of Kansas (654th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 8.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled hearing disability settles in the top 3.5% nationally, coronary heart disease stands in the top 4.7% nationally, and fine-particle is in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and tooth loss sits in the top 10.2% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and modeled extreme heat lands in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled stroke resides in the top 10.1% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the top 11.8% nationally.
In plain language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 67347, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 64%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 19%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 34%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 37%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 34%
11%
Disability
healthier than 14%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 14%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 37%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 41%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 54%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 1%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 11%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 39%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 16%
11%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 7%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
67334
Kansasshares a border
Score 39.27
Closest healthier
67347
Kansasshares a border
Score 49.45
Similar health profile
38924
Mississippi98% similar profile
Score 29.51
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.2% | 31.3–39.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.5% | 39.9–49.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.0% | 9.9–12.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.2–11.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.9% | 9.6–12.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.5% | 9.8–13.4 |
| Depression among adults | 20.9% | 17.7–24.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.8% | 13.5–18.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.6% | 36.8–46.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.5% | 32.1–49.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.3% | 4.7–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 23.1% | 19.2–27.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.3% | 7.3–11.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.7% | 80.1–85.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.8% | 75.2–82.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.7% | 83.6–87.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.9% | 60.2–71.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 57.4% | 53.5–61.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 68.4% | 59.3–76.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.5% | 11.0–16.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.7% | 16.2–23.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.7% | 27.9–39.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.6% | 27.8–41.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 24.6% | 20.8–28.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.8% | 14.6–19.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.9% | 14.5–19.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.6% | 14.3–18.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.9% | 34.5–45.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.9–13.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.7% | 9.1–12.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.4% | 18.2–24.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.5% | 4.7–6.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.6% | 5.7–7.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 21.0% | 17.7–24.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.2% | 12.2–18.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.2% | 8.1–12.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.2% | 9.2–13.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.8–9.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.8% | 23.9–33.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 7.7–10.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | KS median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 18.4% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 2.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688 |
| Broadband subscription | 75.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 26.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 19.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688 |
| Homeownership rate | 86.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.3% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692 |
| Single-parent households | 58.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684 |
| Population 65+ | 29.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692 |
| Median age | 58.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689 |
| Median household income | $52,857 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659 |
| Median home value | $46,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627 |
| Median gross rent | $1,050 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $820 ($592–$1,257) n=519 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | KS median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.4 yr ± 1.21 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured