Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66749

in Iola, KansasPopulation 7,448

46.23/ 100

Ranked #21,062 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #528 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

15 ppb

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.0%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

9.4%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

7.2%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Iola, Kansas (ZIP 66749) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,062nd) and the bottom 23% of Kansas (528th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: lead in tap water sits in the top 1.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum. Modeled energy burden is in the top 2.8% nationally, and mammography stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure settles in the top 12.9% nationally. Better still, elder services lies in the top 5.3% nationally, and pharmacy resides in the top 8.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Physicians sits in the top 13.6% nationally.

In plainer terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 66751, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $60,093 predicts 78.1 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,227 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.7 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.6 years — 3.8 years below them.

    Ranked #2,932 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.1–32.7
High blood pressure among adults36.0%31.9–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Depression among adults22.7%19.3–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.7–41.0
Obesity among adults37.0%29.6–44.4
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.0%13.1–19.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.7–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.3–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%73.4–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.1–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.2%54.7–65.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.5%57.9–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.4%59.4–76.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%12.7–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%14.2–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%24.8–33.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%29.5–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%17.7–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.4–18.2
Any disability among adults34.8%30.4–39.1
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.9–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.0–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.6–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.1–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6413.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)5.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle9.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate67.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households43.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$60,093$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$107,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$776$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured