Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66616

in Topeka, KansasPopulation 6,212

39.99/ 100

Ranked #26,764 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #656 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranked #53 of 57 Topeka, KS ZIPs (bottom 7.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

5.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

36.7%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST75th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.6%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

11.8%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.9%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

12.5%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

27.5%

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

18.8%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 66616, one of several in Topeka, Kansas ranks in the bottom 17% nationally (26,764th) and the bottom 3.9% of Kansas (656th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: transit lies in the top 4.4% nationally, and elder services resides in the top 8.1% nationally. Fiber broadband lands in the top 10.3% nationally. Against that, floodplain exposure registers in the top 7.3% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 10.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle rests in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the top 9.4% nationally, utility shutoff stands in the top 12.6% nationally, and extreme heat settles in the top 13.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lies in the top 10.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 66542, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Topeka, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%27.4–32.1
High blood pressure among adults42.3%39.5–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Depression among adults23.9%21.3–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%14.3–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%40.0–45.8
Obesity among adults42.9%39.0–46.9
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%16.3–22.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.9%12.8–17.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.6–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%75.9–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.7–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%61.3–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%55.8–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%69.6–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%12.0–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%17.8–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%30.4–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%34.4–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%24.6–30.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.7–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.8–20.9
Any disability among adults39.9%36.5–43.4
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.2%18.0–22.4
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%20.0–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%19.3–25.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.1–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.5–18.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
Loneliness among adults32.3%29.2–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.0–14.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6416.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle11.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate69.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households28.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$51,893$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$82,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$1,078$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured