Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66021

in Edgerton, KansasPopulation 2,819

57.32/ 100

Ranked #6,969 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #67 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 9.9%)

Ranked #54 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

98.8%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

39 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.9%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.9%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.3%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.8%

in the bottom 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.5%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

11.2%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.5%

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Edgerton, Kansas (ZIP 66021) places in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,969th) and the top 9.9% of Kansas (67th).

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: home broadband subscription is in the top 6.1% nationally, and poverty lands in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the bottom 12.7% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, fatal road crashes lies in the top 7.3% nationally, modeled transportation noise rests in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 8.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 66030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 21.3; chronic-disease standing 80.3 — 59 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,311 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%22.4–26.2
High blood pressure among adults32.6%30.3–35.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.6
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.1–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Depression among adults20.7%18.7–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%35.0–39.8
Obesity among adults34.1%30.9–37.4
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.7–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.6–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%73.1–77.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%74.9–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.1–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%62.9–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.7%66.2–71.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%71.2–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%16.6–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.0%11.9–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%19.4–25.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%30.4–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%12.9–16.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%10.2–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.4
Any disability among adults27.9%25.0–30.6
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Mobility disability among adults11.2%9.8–12.5
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.9–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–6.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.1–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Loneliness among adults29.4%26.7–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle0.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription98.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate89.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$88,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$242,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$1,288$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured