Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65766

in Udall, MissouriPopulation 77

32.75/ 100

Ranked #30,102 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.2%)

Ranked #908 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 8.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

15.5%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

29.9%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.1%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

50%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

8.8%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

48.8%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

54.5%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Udall, Missouri (ZIP 65766) ranks in the bottom 6.2% nationally (30,102nd) and the bottom 8.6% of Missouri (908th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled hearing disability stands in the top 0.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 0.6% nationally, and stroke stands in the top 1.1% nationally. Unemployment sits in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure stands in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the top 1.9% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally.

Against its neighbors, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 65609, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults48.1%43.4–52.7
High blood pressure among adults53.0%47.8–58.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.5–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults13.8%11.6–16.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults17.4%13.3–21.4
Depression among adults26.3%22.4–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.6%17.2–24.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened48.8%43.8–53.8
Obesity among adults41.7%33.3–50.4
Stroke among adults7.1%5.8–8.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.4%14.1–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%6.2–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.7%85.3–89.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.9%83.0–88.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.3%88.1–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%59.1–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.4%47.3–55.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%64.1–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.8%7.0–10.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.4%15.3–25.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.6%33.5–49.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%29.1–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.4%25.0–38.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%14.5–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults21.6%17.8–25.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%15.3–22.8
Any disability among adults50.1%42.9–57.0
Hearing disability among adults15.5%13.4–17.9
Independent living disability among adults13.6%10.7–16.7
Mobility disability among adults29.9%24.0–35.7
Self-care disability among adults6.8%5.2–8.5
Vision disability among adults8.2%6.5–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.8%14.0–21.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%11.8–22.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.8%11.1–21.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%8.3–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.7–10.8
Loneliness among adults28.3%22.8–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.7–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6437.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)50.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle12.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription72.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)54.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households60.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+26.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$81,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.3 yr ± 2.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.78 years of 86.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured