Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

65570

in Success, MissouriPopulation 715

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

35.67/ 100

Ranked #29,120 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.2%)

Ranked #842 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

50.2%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Park land

26.9%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

68.8%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18.3 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.7%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Success, Missouri (ZIP 65570) lands in the bottom 9.2% nationally (29,120th) and the bottom 15% of Missouri (842nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and park land resides in the top 5.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 5.7% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. On the other side, housing-cost burden lies in the top 3.0% nationally, modeled mobility disability lands in the top 5.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the top 6.0% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the top 6.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 65552, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.6%33.8–41.3
High blood pressure among adults45.4%41.0–49.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.7
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.2%11.4–15.1
Depression among adults26.9%23.2–30.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%14.7–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.4–47.4
Obesity among adults42.4%34.7–50.5
Stroke among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%15.8–22.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.2–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.6–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.4–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.6–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%54.1–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.1%51.3–58.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.0%60.2–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.7–16.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.8%18.4–25.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.1%31.8–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%31.9–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.4%24.6–32.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.0–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%16.8–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.7%18.1–23.3
Any disability among adults45.4%40.3–50.2
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
Mobility disability among adults23.6%20.5–26.6
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.9%15.9–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.0%14.8–21.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.5–19.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.1–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6442.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)19.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription68.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)50.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population8.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households79.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+34.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age62.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$34,573$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$76,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,264$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.6 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 76.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured