Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65321

in Blackburn, MissouriPopulation 405

46.60/ 100

Ranked #20,631 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #352 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

5.6%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.2%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Blackburn, Missouri (ZIP 65321), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 36% nationally (20,631st) and the top 35% of Missouri (352nd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: housing-cost burden is in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas stands in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Poverty settles in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 18% nationally. On the other side, PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat is in the top 19% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 64001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.2–37.1
High blood pressure among adults39.8%35.7–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.4–11.2
Depression among adults24.7%21.3–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.7–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%37.1–45.6
Obesity among adults38.3%31.0–45.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.0–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.8–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.1–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.1–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.2–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%62.0–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.5–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.2–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.9–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%15.7–21.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%27.4–37.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%32.3–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.2–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.1–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.9–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.5%15.4–19.8
Any disability among adults39.5%34.8–44.2
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Mobility disability among adults18.2%15.7–20.8
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.6–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.3–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.8–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.6
Loneliness among adults31.8%27.0–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)5.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate80.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households55.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age46.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$82,019$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$124,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$747$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured