Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65264

in Martinsburg, MissouriPopulation 919

43.80/ 100

Ranked #23,615 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #495 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

4.7%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

25.3 mi

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Martinsburg, Missouri (ZIP 65264) ranks in the bottom 26% nationally (23,615th) and the top 50% of Missouri (495th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: distance to an emergency room sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled hearing disability is in the top 6.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 14.3% nationally, household income registers in the bottom 10.1% nationally, and modeled mobility disability rests in the top 16% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled pfas stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally, childcare lies in the top 1.3% nationally, and homeownership lands in the top 12.2% nationally. Unemployment sits in the bottom 16% nationally.

To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Close by, ZIP 63361, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%32.1–38.3
High blood pressure among adults41.8%38.0–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Depression among adults24.7%21.7–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.8–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%36.1–44.2
Obesity among adults37.3%30.8–44.1
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.2%13.8–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.3–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%79.2–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.6–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.3–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.7–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.9–61.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%65.5–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.4–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.6–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.8%29.5–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%31.7–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.2–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.9–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.2–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.6–20.7
Any disability among adults41.6%37.5–46.0
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.2%17.8–22.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.6–22.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.3–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.0–12.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.1–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.3
Loneliness among adults30.6%26.7–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–640.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate92.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households45.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$46,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$105,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$398$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured