Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65251

in Fulton, MissouriPopulation 22,579

47.70/ 100

Ranked #19,325 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #284 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #22 of 31 Jefferson City, MO ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

10.1%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

231 units

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fulton, Missouri (ZIP 65251) ranks in the bottom 40% nationally (19,325th) and the top 29% of Missouri (284th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled pfas lies in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing is in the top 10.6% nationally. Fiber broadband registers in the top 11.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Elder services registers in the top 16% nationally, and modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 18% nationally. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss is in the top 11.4% nationally, lead in tap water registers in the top 14.1% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 14.6% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 65010, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jefferson City, MO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $63,072 predicts 78.3 years — 1.5 years below.

    Ranked #1,787 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%24.9–31.2
High blood pressure among adults35.9%32.0–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Depression among adults25.3%21.7–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%32.3–40.8
Obesity among adults37.4%29.7–45.6
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.1–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.7–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%72.3–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%72.9–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.5%79.2–83.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.3–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.2%55.4–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.8–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.2–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%15.0–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%25.0–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%31.2–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.7–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.5–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.8–21.2
Any disability among adults36.8%32.4–41.4
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.5–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.9–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.4–17.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.7%10.0–13.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.8–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.5–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6412.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate66.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households52.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$63,072$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$177,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$858$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured