Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64771

in Moundville, MissouriPopulation 490

45.35/ 100

Ranked #22,044 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #414 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.3%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

86 µg/L

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.2%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Moundville, Missouri (ZIP 64771) ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,044th) and the top 42% of Missouri (414th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled pfas registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 12.4% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 13.4% nationally, and households without a vehicle sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, lithium in drinking water is in the top 4.1% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 13.2% nationally, and modeled extreme heat registers in the top 18% nationally.

To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 64741, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%28.6–36.3
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.6–44.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
Depression among adults24.3%20.7–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.5–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.4–45.9
Obesity among adults36.2%28.3–44.7
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.5–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%6.9–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%75.9–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.4–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.8–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%56.3–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.3–62.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%62.1–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.2–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.3–21.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%25.0–35.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%31.1–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%18.9–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.1–19.5
Any disability among adults38.4%33.7–43.5
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.0–20.2
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.5–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.1–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.8–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Loneliness among adults29.9%25.1–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)14.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription94.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households70.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+30.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age52.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$61,645$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$120,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$645$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.76 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured