Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64454

in Gower, MissouriPopulation 2,941

49.60/ 100

Ranked #16,793 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #205 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #111 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.4%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

27 days/year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Gower, Missouri (ZIP 64454), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 48% nationally (16,793rd) and the top 21% of Missouri (205th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Homeownership stands in the top 18% nationally, and civic is in the top 19% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon rests in the top 8.9% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 17% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Lithium in drinking water lands in the top 18% nationally.

In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 64401, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%28.2–34.1
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.7–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Depression among adults24.7%21.7–27.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.3–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.7–42.7
Obesity among adults38.9%32.9–44.7
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%13.2–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.0–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.7–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%76.1–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%60.7–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.7%60.3–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%66.0–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.6–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.3–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.8–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%29.6–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.2–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
Any disability among adults36.7%32.7–40.9
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.1–18.3
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.1%15.5–20.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.9–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.8–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.0–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Loneliness among adults28.4%24.5–32.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate89.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households52.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age36.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$87,262$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$260,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$945$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured