Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63648

in Irondale, MissouriPopulation 1,858

33.83/ 100

Ranked #29,797 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.1%)

Ranked #891 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Cognitive disability

22.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.2%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.6 mi

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

59%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

20.6%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

10.7 days/year

in the top 34% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US66th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Irondale, Missouri (ZIP 63648), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 7.1% nationally (29,797th) and the bottom 10.3% of Missouri (891st).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled tree cover rests in the top 12.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and short sleep is in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 7.1% nationally, modeled mammography stands in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 11.6% nationally, obesity lies in the top 9.0% nationally, and tooth loss rests in the top 11.5% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 63601, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.3–35.9
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.6–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.6%11.2–14.1
Depression among adults27.7%24.0–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.0–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.2–43.3
Obesity among adults43.0%35.1–51.1
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%19.1–26.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.6–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.3–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.4–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults80.5%78.2–82.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.0%53.8–64.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.3%45.6–53.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.4%60.0–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.9–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.1%22.1–28.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.8%31.8–41.9
Short sleep duration among adults43.2%36.5–50.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.5%25.3–31.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.9%18.7–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.6–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.6%20.2–25.2
Any disability among adults43.8%39.3–48.6
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.5
Mobility disability among adults21.1%18.7–23.5
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.8–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.6%17.6–23.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.5–22.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.4–17.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.4%10.0–12.8
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.5–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.7–13.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6431.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)12.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate82.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households40.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age40.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$51,765$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$99,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured