Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63537

in Edina, MissouriPopulation 2,194

39.07/ 100

Ranked #27,340 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.8%)

Ranked #729 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

26.5%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.4%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.1%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Edina, Missouri (ZIP 63537), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 14.8% nationally (27,340th) and the bottom 27% of Missouri (729th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled hearing disability resides in the top 3.8% nationally, tooth loss lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the top 8.8% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 9.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the top 9.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Better still, mental-health providers registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and dental providers lands in the top 4.7% nationally. Outpatient resides in the top 5.8% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, mental-health providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 63531, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 10.4 — 81 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #455 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.3%31.7–39.2
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.3–47.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–12.0
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.4%10.7–14.2
Depression among adults24.9%21.4–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.0–17.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%36.9–46.0
Obesity among adults38.7%30.7–47.4
Stroke among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.5%22.2–31.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.0–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.7–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.0–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.7–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.1%55.5–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.9%50.9–58.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.4%61.7–78.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.6–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%16.9–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.4%29.9–41.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%29.2–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.6%23.1–30.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.3–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.7–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.4%17.9–23.1
Any disability among adults44.0%39.0–49.5
Hearing disability among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
Independent living disability among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
Mobility disability among adults22.1%19.1–25.4
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.5–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%13.3–19.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.6–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.1–14.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.1–10.9
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.0–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6420.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription75.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate81.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$59,891$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$105,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$655$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured