Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

63467

in Saverton, MissouriPopulation 19

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

36.24/ 100

Ranked #28,885 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.0%)

Ranked #824 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

7.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

69.8%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

24.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Saverton, Missouri (ZIP 63467), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally (28,885th) and the bottom 17% of Missouri (824th).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: households without a vehicle sits at the national maximum, modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure registers in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the top 1.8% nationally. More positively, housing-cost burden lands at the national minimum, and poverty is at the national minimum. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and homeownership rests at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 3.6% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, households without a vehicle runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 62343, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%24.8–31.8
High blood pressure among adults34.6%30.5–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.3–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%4.9–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%7.4–11.6
Depression among adults28.3%24.2–32.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.5–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%31.0–39.7
Obesity among adults41.7%33.3–50.5
Stroke among adults3.4%2.9–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.0%16.9–27.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%6.4–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.8%69.0–76.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.3%71.1–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults80.4%76.9–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%57.9–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.1%51.2–61.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.8%57.0–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%15.3–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.8%16.7–27.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.8%24.3–37.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%30.4–48.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%18.3–27.9
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%17.9–24.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%13.5–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.3%17.4–25.3
Any disability among adults38.5%32.2–44.9
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Independent living disability among adults10.9%8.8–13.2
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.1–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.7–5.8
Vision disability among adults5.7%4.6–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%16.5–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%12.5–21.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%10.4–18.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%10.8–17.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.2–12.4
Loneliness among adults33.1%27.6–38.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.6–12.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)—3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle100.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age—42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income—$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value—$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.57 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured