Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62836

in Ewing, IllinoisPopulation 891

48.35/ 100

Ranked #18,488 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #911 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

68%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.0%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.93%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Ewing, Illinois (ZIP 62836) stands in the bottom 42% nationally (18,488th) and the bottom 33% of Illinois (911th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled pfas resides in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled mammography sits in the bottom 7.6% nationally, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 8.8% nationally, and slow internet speeds stands in the top 12.0% nationally. Walkability sits in the bottom 16% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 62856, about 5.2 miles away, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.8%24.4–31.2
High blood pressure among adults34.3%30.2–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Depression among adults23.6%19.9–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.9–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%31.6–40.1
Obesity among adults39.5%31.3–47.7
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.1%14.0–20.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.4–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.1–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.0–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%82.7–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%57.1–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.2–65.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.0%59.6–76.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.0–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.7–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%19.9–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.3%31.6–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.0–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.3–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.0–17.1
Any disability among adults31.5%27.1–36.0
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.3–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%21.6–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.4–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%10.9–16.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.4–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
Loneliness among adults34.1%29.1–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6416.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription83.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate88.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households65.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$73,281$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$123,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,042$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured