Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62661

in Loami, IllinoisPopulation 1,212

55.00/ 100

Ranked #9,446 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #361 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #15 of 30 Springfield, IL ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

15.9%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.17%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Loami, Illinois (ZIP 62661) lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,446th) and the top 26% of Illinois (361st).

continue reading

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled arsenic resides in the top 9.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking registers in the top 11.9% nationally, and radon sits in the top 18% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians is at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Walkability stands in the bottom 20% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 62615, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%25.1–31.9
High blood pressure among adults35.7%31.6–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Depression among adults21.8%18.6–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.5–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%32.5–41.2
Obesity among adults38.5%31.1–46.4
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.1–14.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.7–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%73.9–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.4–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.5–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%59.2–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.8%61.1–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%63.0–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%15.8–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%10.9–16.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.2%16.5–24.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%27.5–40.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.2–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.2–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.3–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.6–14.2
Any disability among adults27.8%23.9–32.3
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.7%10.9–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.8–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.4–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.8–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.4–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Loneliness among adults31.9%26.7–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate84.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households63.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+18.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age34.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$80,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$180,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$907$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured