Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61774

in Stanford, IllinoisPopulation 949

57.09/ 100

Ranked #7,190 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #264 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #11 of 24 Bloomington, IL ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

37.8%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

56.7 mi

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.3%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.37%

in the bottom 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.4%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, Stanford, Illinois (ZIP 61774) lands in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,190th) and the top 19% of Illinois (264th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 12.7% nationally, modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 13.1% nationally, and modeled tooth loss lands in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled arsenic is in the top 1.9% nationally, and radon settles in the top 9.1% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking registers in the top 9.3% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 61705, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bloomington, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.0%22.8–29.5
High blood pressure among adults33.1%29.1–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Depression among adults22.8%19.2–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.4–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%32.8–41.6
Obesity among adults35.2%28.1–43.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%5.9–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.6–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.4–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.2–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.6–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.2%59.7–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%63.9–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%63.7–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.0–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%10.3–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%15.5–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%26.3–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.0–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.2–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.4–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.5–14.1
Any disability among adults26.2%22.2–30.6
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.5–13.2
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.4–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.9–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%6.9–10.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.1–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Loneliness among adults32.0%27.0–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–647.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)2.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle8.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate86.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households64.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$86,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$179,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,142$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured