Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61737

in Ellsworth, IllinoisPopulation 416

46.35/ 100

Ranked #20,918 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #1,056 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #23 of 24 Bloomington, IL ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

37.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.1%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

58.5 mi

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.4%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.1%

in the top 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.2 mi

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

41.8%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Ellsworth, Illinois (ZIP 61737) sits in the bottom 35% nationally (20,918th) and the bottom 23% of Illinois (1,056th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled pfas settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally, distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 9.1% nationally, and homeownership is in the top 9.4% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the top 14.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 14.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled arsenic registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and mammography lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Modeled radon resides in the top 10.9% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Lead in tap water settles in the top 13.8% nationally.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 61722, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bloomington, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%28.4–35.9
High blood pressure among adults40.9%36.5–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.6–11.8
Depression among adults23.3%19.8–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.2–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%37.4–46.5
Obesity among adults39.5%31.9–47.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%11.8–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.3–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.5–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.7–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.7–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%55.9–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%57.5–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.4%56.5–75.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.5–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%14.3–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%21.5–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%26.8–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%18.9–26.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.3–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.5–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%12.7–17.2
Any disability among adults33.5%28.6–38.7
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.2–11.1
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.4–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.3–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.4–18.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.7%12.5–18.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.2–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.2–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.2–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households79.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+15.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age46.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$83,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$178,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 2.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.16 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured