Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61449

in La Fayette, IllinoisPopulation 339

50.61/ 100

Ranked #15,416 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #711 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #44 of 67 Peoria, IL ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

26%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.8%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

67.3%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.02%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.1 ppb

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US90th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.1%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.1%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

9.8%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

41.5%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

La Fayette, Illinois (ZIP 61449), overall, ranks in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,416th) and the bottom 48% of Illinois (711th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: modeled pfas sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and transportation noise lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Homeownership stands in the top 9.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled arsenic resides in the top 4.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 9.8% nationally, and modeled radon sits in the top 12.1% nationally.

Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 61485, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Peoria, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%30.2–36.7
High blood pressure among adults41.4%37.8–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.6–12.6
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.0–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Depression among adults21.0%18.3–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%37.8–45.7
Obesity among adults37.5%30.9–45.0
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%11.0–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.5–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.6–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.8–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.8–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%62.0–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.5–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%67.1–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.8–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.5–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%21.1–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%28.5–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.4–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.1–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.4
Any disability among adults32.8%28.9–36.9
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Mobility disability among adults16.6%14.5–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%20.1–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.6–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.2–13.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.7–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle9.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription67.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate94.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households65.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+25.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age50.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$51,635$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$66,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured