Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60935

in Essex, IllinoisPopulation 1,259

51.47/ 100

Ranked #14,162 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #627 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #8 of 15 Kankakee, IL ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.01%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.5%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

55.5%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.1%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

38.4%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Essex, Illinois (ZIP 60935) ranks in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,162nd) and the top 46% of Illinois (627th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and recreation registers in the top 2.1% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, and modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 7.9% nationally, housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas resides in the top 10.1% nationally.

To spell things out, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 60913, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kankakee, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%25.5–33.0
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.4–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.6–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.9–9.4
Depression among adults21.9%18.3–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.5–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%35.6–45.2
Obesity among adults37.8%30.2–46.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.4–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.7–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%74.2–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%74.7–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.8–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%57.8–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.1%59.1–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%63.3–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%14.9–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.1–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%18.1–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%31.3–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.1–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.8–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.0–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.5
Any disability among adults30.5%25.9–35.4
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.2–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%20.6–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.0–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.1–13.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.7
Loneliness among adults33.1%27.7–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate91.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age34.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$110,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$248,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,143$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured