Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60203

in Skokie, IllinoisPopulation 4,680

68.63/ 100

Ranked #850 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.7%)

Ranked #37 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 2.8%)

Ranked #37 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 9.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$170,224

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.4%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25.8%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

3.9%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.1%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 60203, one of several in Skokie, Illinois ranks in the top 2.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (850th) and the top 2.8% of Illinois (37th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: household income lies in the top 2.3% nationally, and walkability resides in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and obesity registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the bottom 5.1% nationally, tooth loss rests in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and independent living disability is in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Against that, lead in tap water stands in the top 2.3% nationally, modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 5.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 60091, about 0.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.2 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 89.2 — 80 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,188 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.6–26.1
High blood pressure among adults30.4%27.8–32.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.1
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Depression among adults18.0%15.9–20.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%34.2–39.9
Obesity among adults25.8%22.8–28.9
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years3.9%3.1–4.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.2–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.8–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%78.6–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.3%91.2–93.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%60.1–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.0%72.4–77.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.9–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%16.0–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.3%5.8–9.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.7%13.4–18.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.5%27.3–33.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.8%11.0–14.7
Frequent mental distress among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Frequent physical distress among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.4%7.2–9.7
Any disability among adults21.0%18.5–23.6
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Mobility disability among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.6–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.9–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.1–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–8.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Loneliness among adults29.3%26.3–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.7–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)79.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate95.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population16.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households42.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$170,224$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$468,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,795$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.5 yr ± 1.1478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 84.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured