Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60437

in Kinsman, IllinoisPopulation 117

51.20/ 100

Ranked #14,541 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #654 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #274 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

8.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

49.1%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

30.8 mi

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.2%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.7%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5 ppb

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US90th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kinsman, Illinois (ZIP 60437), in overall standing, comes out in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,541st) and the top 48% of Illinois (654th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum, and modeled pfas is in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Homeownership registers in the top 7.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and transportation noise is in the top 0.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled binge drinking registers in the top 7.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 60479, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.5%24.0–31.4
High blood pressure among adults35.0%30.6–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.2–8.8
Depression among adults22.5%18.8–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%9.8–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.1–42.6
Obesity among adults37.5%29.2–46.6
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%8.9–14.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.3–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%72.8–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.2–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.5–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%58.3–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%60.9–69.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%62.6–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.8%16.2–23.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.3–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%19.1–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%28.3–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.4–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.7–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
Any disability among adults28.7%24.2–33.8
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.3–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.1–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%9.6–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.7–13.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.2–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.6
Loneliness among adults31.8%26.6–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6429.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)1.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate95.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households11.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+6.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$58,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$129,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured