Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60425

in Glenwood, IllinoisPopulation 8,714

49.58/ 100

Ranked #16,825 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #785 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #291 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

17.1%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Park land

38.9%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.7%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.5%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

13.9%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

25.4%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

12.2%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Glenwood, Illinois (ZIP 60425), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 48% nationally (16,825th) and the bottom 43% of Illinois (785th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: park land stands in the top 3.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, unemployment sits in the top 2.8% nationally, modeled short sleep lies in the top 7.2% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity rests in the top 7.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 7.2% nationally, utility shutoff is in the top 9.0% nationally, and food insecurity lands in the top 10.6% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the top 12.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 60430, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 2.3 years. A median household income of $77,174 predicts 79.1 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #3,985 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%24.0–28.5
High blood pressure among adults40.2%37.4–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–6.8
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.7
Depression among adults17.6%15.6–19.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.7–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%32.0–37.2
Obesity among adults37.9%34.2–41.7
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.3–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.7–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.5–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%80.3–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults89.9%88.5–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.4%58.5–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%53.8–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%72.4–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.7–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.6–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%22.9–29.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.7%39.0–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%19.9–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.5–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.6–14.9
Any disability among adults30.3%27.3–33.5
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.5–18.3
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%27.5–34.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.4%22.2–28.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.2–28.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.5%18.8–24.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.6–13.8
Loneliness among adults36.6%33.3–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.1–15.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6414.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)17.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate79.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households41.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age44.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$77,174$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$197,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,493$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured