Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60430

in Homewood, IllinoisPopulation 19,838

58.65/ 100

Ranked #5,861 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #217 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #173 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

12 ppb

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.35 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.099 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Homewood, Illinois (ZIP 60430) ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,861st) and the top 16% of Illinois (217th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: dental providers resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and recreation registers in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 9.7% nationally. Pharmacy lies in the top 10.7% nationally, mental-health providers lands in the top 10.9% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 11.8% nationally. Set against that, lead in tap water is in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 5.5% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 7.3% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 60422, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.3 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $96,629 predicts 79.9 years — 1.6 years below.

    Ranked #2,019 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 11.4; chronic-disease standing 74.6 — 63 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,724 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.8–27.1
High blood pressure among adults34.6%32.0–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Depression among adults18.7%16.6–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.7–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.4–37.7
Obesity among adults32.5%29.1–35.7
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.5–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.3–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%75.0–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.7–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%89.6–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%59.5–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.4–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%71.2–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%15.0–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%9.1–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.8%18.3–23.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%34.0–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.7–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.3–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Any disability among adults25.9%23.4–28.5
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.1
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%23.7–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.6–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.8–16.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.9–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.3–9.2
Loneliness among adults33.6%30.6–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription95.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate81.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population6.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households39.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age40.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$96,629$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$221,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,340$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured