Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60184

in Wayne, IllinoisPopulation 2,557

65.05/ 100

Ranked #1,984 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.2%)

Ranked #74 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 5.5%)

Ranked #71 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$163,750

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.3%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.8%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.43 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

40.1%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.3%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.5 mi

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

7.4 ppb

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US94th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wayne, Illinois (ZIP 60184), by its composite score, sits in the top 6.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,984th) and the top 5.5% of Illinois (74th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: household income resides in the top 2.6% nationally, and modeled transportation is in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and elder services stands in the top 2.9% nationally. Park land registers in the top 3.3% nationally, modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and modeled food insecurity sits in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 5.7% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 60175, less than a tenth of a mile away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 8.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 80.0 — 71 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,499 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%23.8–28.8
High blood pressure among adults32.6%29.8–35.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.4–11.1
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.2–10.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Depression among adults18.1%16.0–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.1–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%35.5–41.9
Obesity among adults29.4%25.8–33.6
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.2–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%4.0–5.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.8–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.8–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.7–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%65.4–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.9%71.3–76.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%70.8–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.6–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.8%7.3–10.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.0%14.5–19.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%29.0–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.0%11.3–14.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.4–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.4–11.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.4
Any disability among adults22.0%19.5–24.9
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Mobility disability among adults10.5%9.0–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%18.4–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.6–6.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Loneliness among adults29.8%26.6–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–641.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)61.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate96.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population14.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households72.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age49.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$163,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$642,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured