Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60062

in Northbrook, IllinoisPopulation 41,406

69.55/ 100

Ranked #673 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.1%)

Ranked #28 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 2.1%)

Ranked #28 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 7.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Utility shut-off threat

3.3%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

13 ppb

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.9%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.7%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.7%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.8%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$143,323

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.1%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Northbrook, Illinois (ZIP 60062) sits in the top 2.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (673rd) and the top 2.1% of Illinois (28th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally, transportation lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 0.5% nationally, modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and household income rests in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Against that, lead in tap water lands in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 3.5% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 60015, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.2 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $143,323 predicts 81.5 years — 1.7 years above.

    Ranked #1,145 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 85.7 — 79 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,135 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%23.2–27.7
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.7–33.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–11.9
Current asthma among adults8.6%7.6–9.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Depression among adults17.0%15.0–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%36.3–42.0
Obesity among adults22.7%19.9–25.3
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.9%4.8–7.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%4.0–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.1–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.6–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults92.8%91.9–93.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%62.2–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.9%72.4–77.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%71.9–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.1%14.1–18.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%25.5–31.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Frequent mental distress among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Frequent physical distress among adults9.4%8.4–10.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Any disability among adults21.8%19.6–24.1
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.7
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%18.1–22.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Loneliness among adults28.6%25.8–31.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)70.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population24.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households57.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+27.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age49.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$143,323$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$632,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$2,013$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured