ZIP code
60144
in Kaneville, IllinoisPopulation 66
59.73/ 100
Ranked #5,052 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)
Ranked #193 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 14.2%)
Ranked #156 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 42%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
20.2%
in the top 5.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
41.4%
in the top 8.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
3.0%
in the bottom 9.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS10thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
6.1%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
96.6%
in the top 12.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST92ndUS88thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
6.1%
in the bottom 10.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS10thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
Kaneville, Illinois (ZIP 60144), overall, ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,052nd) and the top 14.2% of Illinois (193rd).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 1.8% nationally, modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum. Households without a vehicle settles at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Poverty is in the bottom 9.8% nationally, and modeled tooth loss sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, and binge drinking lies in the top 5.5% nationally. Housing-cost burden stands in the top 8.6% nationally. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.
Measured against the nearby ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 60119, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 78%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 62%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 94%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
Disability
healthier than 88%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 85%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 54%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 54%
11%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 79%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 71%
16%
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.7%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 82%
8%
Disability
healthier than 86%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 98%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 20%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
Disability
healthier than 65%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 95%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 43%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 45%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 59%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 43%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 53%
8%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
60119
Illinoisshares a border
Score 64.22
Closest healthier
60554
Illinoisabout 1.7 mi away
Score 64.27
Similar health profile
61043
Illinois98% similar profile
Score 58.70
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 26.3% | 22.8–30.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 31.9% | 27.8–36.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.7% | 7.7–9.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.6% | 8.4–11.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.9% | 4.9–7.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.6% | 5.0–8.6 |
| Depression among adults | 20.0% | 16.9–23.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.9% | 8.9–13.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.5% | 32.6–40.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.5% | 28.6–41.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.0% | 2.4–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 6.1% | 4.8–7.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.6% | 3.8–8.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.1% | 71.1–78.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 76.6% | 72.9–80.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.4% | 85.8–90.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.0% | 58.4–67.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 70.0% | 66.6–73.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.2% | 66.6–81.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.2% | 17.0–23.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.6% | 8.9–16.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.5% | 14.1–23.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.8% | 30.3–42.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.2% | 11.8–19.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.0% | 12.6–17.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.2% | 9.9–14.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.1% | 8.8–13.7 |
| Any disability among adults | 23.5% | 18.9–28.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.9–6.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.1% | 4.7–7.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 10.7% | 8.2–13.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.1% | 2.4–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.6% | 2.8–4.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.0% | 18.6–27.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 6.2–12.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 5.3–11.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.0–10.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.4% | 4.1–6.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.9% | 25.2–35.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.2% | 3.9–6.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 3.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 31.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 41.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377 |
| Homeownership rate | 69.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378 |
| Single-parent households | 27.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372 |
| Population 65+ | 7.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378 |
| Median age | 32.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373 |
| Median household income | $59,250 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334 |
| Median home value | $300,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332 |
| Median gross rent | $1,550 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 83.7 yr ± 1.78 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.78 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured