Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60046

in Lake Villa, IllinoisPopulation 34,613

61.51/ 100

Ranked #3,797 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.9%)

Ranked #139 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 10.2%)

Ranked #120 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

65.3%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.9%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$126,042

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.9 mi

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.1%

in the bottom 14.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.4%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

30.4%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Lake Villa, Illinois (ZIP 60046) sits in the top 11.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,797th) and the top 10.2% of Illinois (139th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: park land resides in the top 6.7% nationally, household income lies in the top 7.9% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 10.9% nationally, hearing disability is in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and stroke rests in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 4.8% nationally, and pfas lands in the top 5.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 10.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 60030, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.1–25.6
High blood pressure among adults31.8%28.3–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.0–6.3
Depression among adults20.1%17.1–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%32.8–40.3
Obesity among adults33.3%28.2–38.6
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.3–11.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%6.0–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.0%70.4–77.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%73.2–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.1–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%57.4–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%64.9–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%67.6–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.4–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.7–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%15.3–21.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.7–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%12.9–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%9.8–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.1–12.9
Any disability among adults23.1%20.0–26.3
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Mobility disability among adults10.6%9.1–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.7–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.5–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.4–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population14.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households49.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+12.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$126,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$308,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,655$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured