Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

59874

in Trout Creek, MontanaPopulation 2,266

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

43.17/ 100

Ranked #24,220 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #278 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

77.6%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

5.8%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.2%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

80.5%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

19.9 mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

14.7 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Trout Creek, Montana (ZIP 59874) stands in the bottom 24% nationally (24,220th) and the bottom 18% of Montana (278th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled fine-particle registers in the top 0.8% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled energy burden is in the top 3.9% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 5.6% nationally. On the brighter side, park land registers in the top 0.8% nationally, modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and modeled tree cover is in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 4.9% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 59873, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.4%34.7–42.4
High blood pressure among adults42.2%38.1–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.6–14.1
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.7%9.6–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%9.8–13.0
Depression among adults22.5%19.4–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.4–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.2–43.9
Obesity among adults34.9%28.7–41.7
Stroke among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.2–16.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.7–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%77.7–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.9%71.2–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%60.6–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.0–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.9%66.0–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.1–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%14.0–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.9–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.7–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.3%20.3–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.3
Any disability among adults37.0%32.8–41.7
Hearing disability among adults12.5%11.2–14.1
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Mobility disability among adults19.4%16.8–22.3
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.3–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.4–15.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.2–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Loneliness among adults27.2%23.1–32.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate89.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households78.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+21.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age55.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$64,319$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$540,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$676$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured