ZIP code
58430
in Denhoff, North DakotaPopulation 49
51.45/ 100
Ranked #14,195 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)
Ranked #297 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 20%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Distance to a Superfund site
224.6 mi
in the top 0.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST75thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
1.9%
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST61stUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27.5%
in the bottom 5.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST46thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
15.1 mi
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Radon
3.1 pCi/L
in the top 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST34thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.
Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
13.8%
in the top 8.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Denhoff, North Dakota (ZIP 58430) comes out in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,195th) and the bottom 20% of North Dakota (297th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 0.8% nationally, fiber broadband lies at the national maximum, and poverty sits at the national minimum. Homeownership settles at the national maximum, home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum, and modeled loneliness stands in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled fine-particle is in the top 4.8% nationally, and distance to a nursing home resides in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled radon rests in the top 8.8% nationally.
In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 58444, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Mental Health
healthier than 88%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 84%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 42%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 45%
13%
Disability
healthier than 56%
7%
Holding it back
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 73%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 62%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 54%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 32%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 23%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 21%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 14%
11%
Disability
healthier than 37%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58444
North Dakotashares a border
Score 52.39
Closest healthier
58463
North Dakotashares a border
Score 52.96
Similar health profile
58638
North Dakota97% similar profile
Score 52.87
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.7% | 26.9–35.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.6% | 35.0–45.1 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.3% | 9.2–11.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.7% | 8.5–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.2% | 7.0–9.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.6% | 6.1–9.4 |
| Depression among adults | 20.3% | 17.0–24.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.4% | 10.3–14.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.7% | 34.1–44.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 39.7% | 31.2–50.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.9% | 3.4–4.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 18.8% | 15.3–22.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.4% | 5.3–10.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.1% | 76.9–83.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 76.7% | 72.6–80.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.9% | 84.5–89.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.3% | 57.4–68.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.0% | 54.1–61.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.2% | 66.8–82.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 19.5% | 16.2–23.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.5% | 12.6–21.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 26.1% | 20.4–32.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.8% | 27.1–40.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 18.9% | 15.2–23.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.4% | 11.4–15.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.6% | 11.3–16.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.0–15.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 30.7% | 25.4–36.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.9% | 8.6–11.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.5% | 6.1–9.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.2% | 11.5–17.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.2–4.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.8–5.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 21.5% | 17.6–25.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.8% | 8.0–14.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.0% | 5.0–9.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.9% | 6.8–11.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.8% | 4.6–7.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.5% | 22.7–33.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.7–7.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 13.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | 13.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 34.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | 88.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 67.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 68.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | $52,083 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | $128,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.6 yr ± 0.65 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured