Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

58033

in Fort Ransom, North DakotaPopulation 393

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

58.05/ 100

Ranked #6,347 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #72 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Slow internet speeds

6.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.8%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

107.3 mi

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fort Ransom, North Dakota (ZIP 58033), by its overall standing, sits in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,347th) and the top 19% of North Dakota (72nd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally, distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled transportation lands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 8.6% nationally. By contrast, slow internet speeds rests in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lies in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the top 4.8% nationally, and radon settles in the top 8.3% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 58049, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%24.9–32.0
High blood pressure among adults34.9%30.6–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.4–7.6
Depression among adults20.1%16.8–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.2–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%33.6–42.5
Obesity among adults37.0%29.2–44.9
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%9.9–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.5–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.4–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.4–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.2–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%63.7–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%64.4–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%69.7–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%16.9–24.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%10.8–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%17.6–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%24.4–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.3–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.5–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.3–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%9.7–13.5
Any disability among adults27.2%23.1–31.7
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.6–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.1–14.4
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%16.8–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.6–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%3.8–6.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.8–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.2–6.0
Loneliness among adults26.8%22.2–31.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate83.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households58.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+21.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age49.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$90,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$293,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$350$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 3.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.70 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured