Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57471

in Roscoe, South DakotaPopulation 546

50.65/ 100

Ranked #15,346 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #259 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

7.7%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

185.3 mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.97 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST22nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

31.2 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST68th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.1%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Roscoe, South Dakota (ZIP 57471) stands in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,346th) and the bottom 28% of South Dakota (259th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 1.2% nationally, and fiber broadband resides in the top 4.6% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Homeownership sits in the top 10.0% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 10.4% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 11.5% nationally. By contrast, modeled energy burden sits in the top 0.8% nationally, walkability resides in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled radon sits in the top 7.8% nationally.

For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 57428, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.2–33.7
High blood pressure among adults36.6%32.3–41.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.7–9.1
Depression among adults20.3%17.0–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%10.8–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.4–41.8
Obesity among adults34.9%27.1–43.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.6–14.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.3–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.0–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.2–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.1–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.1%58.9–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.2%63.5–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.1–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.0–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.3–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.0%19.9–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%24.2–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.2–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.7–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.6–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.4–15.1
Any disability among adults31.3%27.0–36.0
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.2–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6416.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate94.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population7.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+23.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age46.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$67,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$78,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured