Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57073

in Wakonda, South DakotaPopulation 564

55.06/ 100

Ranked #9,379 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #126 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.3 pCi/L

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.12%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.2%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

6.8%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Wakonda, South Dakota (ZIP 57073) ranks in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,379th) and the top 35% of South Dakota (126th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: elder services stands in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and pfas lands in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled radon sits in the top 1.1% nationally, modeled fine-particle rests in the top 12.9% nationally, and distance to a community health center is in the top 13.5% nationally. Lithium in drinking water stands in the top 14.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 57004, about 1.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%26.6–35.8
High blood pressure among adults37.8%32.1–43.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%10.9–13.9
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.3–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.3–8.9
Depression among adults20.1%16.1–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%10.7–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%32.9–44.3
Obesity among adults37.5%28.4–47.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.3–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.2–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%77.3–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%74.8–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.0–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%64.8–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.0%67.6–74.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%70.9–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%12.4–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.0–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%19.8–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults28.3%22.4–34.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.8%13.8–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults13.2%11.1–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%10.9–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.0–13.9
Any disability among adults30.9%25.7–36.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.4–8.9
Mobility disability among adults14.7%12.1–17.5
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6418.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription85.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate76.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households67.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+35.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age54.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$73,281$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$116,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$694$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.3 yr ± 1.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.75 years of 80.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured