Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56672

in Remer, MinnesotaPopulation 2,052

48.65/ 100

Ranked #18,135 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #757 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 12.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

26.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

35.8 mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

9.4 days/year

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.7 per million

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.2%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

12.8 mi

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Remer, Minnesota (ZIP 56672), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 43% nationally (18,135th) and the bottom 12.6% of Minnesota (757th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: distance to a community health center registers in the top 2.8% nationally, modeled fine-particle is in the top 3.7% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Modeled energy burden registers in the top 7.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the top 10.2% nationally. On the better side, modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and grocery registers in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 10.2% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 56448, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.9%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.8–34.3
High blood pressure among adults41.2%37.3–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.1%10.9–13.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Depression among adults22.5%19.4–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%35.8–43.8
Obesity among adults36.8%31.0–42.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.3%10.0–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.9–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.2–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.6–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.6–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%66.4–75.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.7–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%68.4–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.0–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.4–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%24.5–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%29.7–40.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%18.0–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.5–14.7
Any disability among adults34.9%30.8–39.0
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.1–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.0–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.9–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.4
Loneliness among adults26.1%21.9–30.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription85.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate87.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households69.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+32.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age55.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$61,842$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$274,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$896$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.4478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.44 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured