Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56626

in Bena, MinnesotaPopulation 254

31.64/ 100

Ranked #30,399 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.2%)

Ranked #861 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

31.6%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

13.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.2%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.5%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

37.8%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.6%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bena, Minnesota (ZIP 56626), overall, ranks in the bottom 5.2% nationally (30,399th) and the bottom 0.6% of Minnesota (861st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled tooth loss settles in the top 2.3% nationally, hearing disability is in the top 1.8% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the top 3.2% nationally, independent living disability lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and fine-particle stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 3.6% nationally, and self-care disability registers in the top 5.4% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled transportation settles in the top 3.6% nationally.

Defined simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 56633, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.05%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.7–33.9
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.5–46.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.3–14.3
Coronary heart disease among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
Depression among adults24.8%21.4–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.3%16.9–21.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.0–40.5
Obesity among adults43.4%37.2–49.5
Stroke among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.6%26.8–36.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%9.7–14.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.7–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.4–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.9%79.6–84.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.9%54.5–64.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.1%45.4–52.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%64.4–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.0%23.7–30.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.7%32.8–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults42.7%37.2–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.4%27.7–35.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.6–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.6%17.3–21.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.8%17.4–22.2
Any disability among adults45.7%41.1–50.3
Hearing disability among adults13.1%11.8–14.5
Independent living disability among adults14.1%12.5–15.9
Mobility disability among adults24.0%21.1–26.7
Self-care disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Vision disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.5%22.7–30.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.6%25.7–34.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.8%21.3–28.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.0%17.3–23.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.5–20.0
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.4–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate37.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6417.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)29.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate65.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households75.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+8.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age33.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$44,853$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$150,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$857$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.7 yr ± 1.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.89 years of 71.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured