Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56378

in Sauk Centre, MinnesotaPopulation 8,649

50.49/ 100

Ranked #15,574 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #674 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #31 of 32 St. Cloud, MN ZIPs (bottom 3.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.73 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.4 mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.5%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.7%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.86 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sauk Centre, Minnesota (ZIP 56378), by its overall standing, sits in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,574th) and the bottom 22% of Minnesota (674th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: elder services resides in the top 1.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers lies in the top 8.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Dental providers settles in the top 9.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 14.4% nationally. By contrast, distance to a community health center lands in the top 3.5% nationally, modeled fine-particle is in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled radon resides in the top 9.5% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 56312, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Cloud, MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.8 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $72,567 predicts 78.8 years — 3.0 years above.

    Ranked #441 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.5%24.2–28.9
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.9–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Depression among adults24.8%22.2–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%33.3–39.3
Obesity among adults37.2%32.9–41.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.8–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.2–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.6–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.8–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.9–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.9–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.1%62.3–67.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%72.2–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%15.1–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%14.1–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%23.2–29.7
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%26.2–33.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.8–21.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.3–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.9–16.2
Any disability among adults31.2%28.1–34.6
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.7–16.3
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.9–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.7–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Loneliness among adults30.3%26.7–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle8.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate71.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households57.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$72,567$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$267,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$853$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured