Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56296

in Wheaton, MinnesotaPopulation 1,956

47.66/ 100

Ranked #19,378 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #792 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 8.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

6.8%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

57.7 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

57.5 mi

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.5%

in the top 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$53,527

in the bottom 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Wheaton, Minnesota (ZIP 56296) ranks in the bottom 40% nationally (19,378th) and the bottom 8.6% of Minnesota (792nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled energy burden stands in the top 1.3% nationally, and distance to a community health center lies in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled radon lands in the top 6.4% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 4.7% nationally. On the better side, pharmacy is in the top 5.0% nationally, dental providers settles in the top 6.6% nationally, and outpatient resides in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 13.5% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Close by, ZIP 56211, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.1–33.0
High blood pressure among adults38.0%33.7–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.5%10.3–12.6
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.6–9.2
Depression among adults23.0%19.6–26.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%33.6–42.9
Obesity among adults38.3%30.0–47.2
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.4–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.3%7.7–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.4–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.1–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.5–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%65.5–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.8%59.3–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%67.4–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.5–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.7–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%23.3–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.8%24.9–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%16.8–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.1–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.9–15.7
Any disability among adults34.5%29.8–39.3
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.5%13.9–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.7–24.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.1–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.4–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.8–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Loneliness among adults29.2%24.5–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–643.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle6.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription82.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate80.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+28.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$53,527$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$103,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$612$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured