Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56265

in Montevideo, MinnesotaPopulation 7,225

49.72/ 100

Ranked #16,630 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #714 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

22.8 mi

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

65.9 mi

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.2%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST56th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.2%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

47 µg/L

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

40.3%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

15.3 days/year

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Montevideo, Minnesota (ZIP 56265), overall, ranks in the bottom 48% nationally (16,630th) and the bottom 18% of Minnesota (714th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: childcare sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 7.4% nationally, and elder services stands in the top 11.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 14.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon resides in the top 4.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled fine-particle is in the top 7.8% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 9.2% nationally.

Defined simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 56218, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.6%24.8–30.6
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.2–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.1–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Depression among adults24.2%21.0–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.1–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%31.8–39.5
Obesity among adults40.3%33.5–47.6
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.6–14.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.8–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%77.0–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.6–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.3–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%63.0–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.6–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.7–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.9–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%14.1–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%24.7–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%25.3–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.5–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.0–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
Any disability among adults32.5%28.5–36.5
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.6–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.5–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.1–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.2–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.4–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle8.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate72.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population6.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age42.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$74,848$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$162,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$851$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured