Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56093

in Waseca, MinnesotaPopulation 12,672

51.74/ 100

Ranked #13,782 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #581 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.7%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

40.2%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Waseca, Minnesota (ZIP 56093) sits in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,782nd) and the bottom 33% of Minnesota (581st).

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Recreation stands in the top 17% nationally. Against that, modeled radon resides in the top 6.3% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 12.9% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 13.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk stands in the top 16% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 55049, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.8 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $73,038 predicts 78.8 years — 2.0 years above.

    Ranked #936 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.3–28.1
High blood pressure among adults32.4%28.8–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Depression among adults25.4%21.9–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%30.4–38.6
Obesity among adults40.2%32.8–48.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.7–14.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.1–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.5–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%71.0–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%82.1–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%62.9–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.6–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%68.1–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.8–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.4–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%23.5–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults29.7%23.9–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%16.5–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.2–16.8
Any disability among adults31.6%27.5–35.9
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.8–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.3–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.6–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.7–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate77.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population3.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households49.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$73,038$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$221,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$906$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured