Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55983

in Wanamingo, MinnesotaPopulation 1,874

56.88/ 100

Ranked #7,392 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #228 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

18.8 mi

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.1%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

9.8%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Wanamingo, Minnesota (ZIP 55983) lands in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,392nd) and the top 26% of Minnesota (228th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and pfas is in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening lands in the top 10.2% nationally, and utility shutoff lies in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center stands in the top 9.0% nationally, and modeled fine-particle rests in the top 12.9% nationally. Modeled radon registers in the top 16% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the top 13.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles in the top 15% nationally.

Put simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. On the overall standing, ZIP 55027, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.0–26.7
High blood pressure among adults33.3%29.5–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Depression among adults23.2%19.9–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.7–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.0%30.3–37.8
Obesity among adults35.0%28.8–41.3
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%8.9–13.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.4–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%74.9–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.6%71.1–77.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.9–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.1%67.6–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.1–72.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%71.8–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.6–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.2–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.9%19.9–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%26.4–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%13.4–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.8–14.4
Any disability among adults27.5%23.8–31.7
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.1–8.1
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.4–14.2
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.3–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.8–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.5–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.0%23.6–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle9.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate78.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age35.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$82,446$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$283,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$692$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured